Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Mack v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Dawn Rose Mack
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Elvis McGhee, Aniya Flava and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Pina et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Plaintiff:
Steven Rose
Defendant:
Alejandro Pina, Heather Christian, Christina Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose v. Northern Division of Parole
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Rose
Defendant:
Northern Division of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonning v. Clifford
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Amy Rose Bonning
Defendant:
Matthew Clifford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Holz, Bartlette, Brendal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belmonte v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Damers Shirak Duranzan, David Belmonte and David L Belmonte
Defendant:
King County, King County Department of Public Defense, Anita Khandelwal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Fleming, et al.
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Thomas Aaron Warren
Defendant:
Rose Fleming, Idaho Department of Corrections, Camilla Cafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Qaurra Rose
Defendant:
C.O Rodriguez, Erin Reyes, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Black Rose Auto
as 6:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Black Rose Auto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
