Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Michael Williams v. H. Brar, et al
as 12-16003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
H. BRAR, Nephrologist Doctor at Coalinga State Hospital, INGRID FREEMAN, Nurse at Coalinga State Hospital, RUDY WIDODO, Psychiatric Technician at Coalinga State Hospital and others
Gabriel Cortez v. Matthew Cates, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-17507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL RUDY CORTEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATES, Esquire, RICHARD J. KIRKLAND, ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden and others
Michael B. Williams v. Brar et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2011cv01372
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Williams
Defendant:
H. Brar, Imgrid Freeman, Rudy Widodo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Prison Health Services et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2010cv04133
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Rudy Wilkins
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, H. Orr and Michelle J. Versalles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cortez v. Cate et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2009cv03021
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rudy Cortez
Defendant:
Mathew L. Cate, Richard J. Kirkland, Robert A. Horel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mori v. Arpaio
as 2:2007cv02166
Plaintiff:
Rudy Jess Mori
Defendant:
Joeseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez v. Flores et al
as 5:2007cv04923
Plaintiff:
Richard Gutierrez
Defendant:
E. Flores, D. Sepulveda, Borish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.