Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Daniel Verduzco v. Mickey Price, et al
as 23-15127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL VERDUZCO
Defendant / Appellee:
MICKEY PRICE, Chief Mental Health Psychologist, R. LIMON, Chief Psychologist, HANNAH E. BUSH and others
Bush v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Dionne J'Shon Bush
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Borla et al
as 5:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Joel B Bush
Defendant:
Associate Warden E. Borla, Facility Captain M. Wade, CCII V. Lizaola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Modee #145289 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00454
Defendant:
Travis Murty, Unknown Plancarte, Unknown Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Shalek E Modee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veruzco v. Price
as 4:2019cv01440
Plaintiff:
Daniel Veruzco
Defendant:
Mickey Price, Peter Sayer, J. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01527
Plaintiff:
Jason Eugene Bush
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Unknown De Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cramer v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv01700
Plaintiff:
James A. Cramer
Defendant:
Laurie Smith, S. Kernan, C. Ducart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Bush v. Santa Clara County Department, et al
as 11-16824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ALAN BUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SANTA CLARA VALLEY HEALTH & HOSPITAL SYSTEM, EDWARD C. FLORES and others
James Bush v. Santa Clara County Department, et al
as 11-16525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ALAN BUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SANTA CLARA VALLEY HEALTH & HOSPITAL SYSTEM, EDWARD C. FLORES and others
Bush v. Dean et al
as 5:2009cv04231
Plaintiff:
James Alan Bush
Defendant:
Dean, Winslow, Edward C. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
