Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gonzalez #270698 v. Hetmer et al
as 2:2022cv01672
Plaintiff:
Adan Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lance Hetmer, Glen Pacheco, Stacey Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaheed-Muhammad #148986 v. Kimble et al
as 2:2020cv01731
Defendant:
James Babiar, Unknown Kimble, Caroline Milligan and others
Plaintiff:
Azuzallah Shaheed-Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff #186716 v. Coleman et al
as 2:2020cv01557
Defendant:
Unknown Morris, Unknown Kimble, David Shinn and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Charles Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff #186716 v. Kimble et al
as 2:2020cv01392
Defendant:
Unknown Morris, Unknown Rode, Unknown Kimble and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Charles Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff #186716 v. Trinity Food Service et al
as 2:2020cv01288
Defendant:
Pam Smith, Trinity Food Service, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Charles Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitmore #236439 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00286
Defendant:
Unknown Schimdt, Unknown Guevarra, Unknown Kimble and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony A Whitmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitmore #236439 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04922
Defendant:
Unknown Guevarra, Unknown Kimble, Charles L Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony A Whitmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #197527 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv02657
Defendant:
Unknown Moore, Unknown Rowe, Unknown Kimble and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Vaughn Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds #96224 v. Gay et al
as 2:2017cv03902
Plaintiff:
Winston V Edmonds
Defendant:
Maureen Gay, Unknown Girts, Unknown Flake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeKenipp v. Babeu et al
as 2:2014cv01971
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew DeKenipp
Defendant:
Paul R Babeu, Unknown Kimble, Unknown Valenzuela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
