Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Rudy Lemus, et al v. Burnham Painting & Drywall Cor, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-17406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUDY LEMUS, MANUEL LOPEZ ZARATE, ARTURO CARRENO GARCIA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BURNHAM PAINTING & DRYWALL CORP., LYLE T. BURNHAM and CENTENNIAL DRYWALL SYSTEMS, INC.
Horton et al v. County of Sacramento
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2009cv00806
Plaintiff:
Audrey Jones, Charles Rich, Shannon Eubanks and others
Defendant:
County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martini v. Porter-Jarvis, L.L.C, et al
as 2:2007cv01747
Plaintiff:
Rudy A Martini
Defendant:
Porter-Jarvis, L.L.C., Randall Porter and David Brent Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Mendez et al v. Balli et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2007cv01086
Plaintiff:
Ruben Mendez, Ruben Mendez, Reyes Acevedo, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bottomley Distributing Co., Inc., Bottomley Distributing Co., Inc., Bottomley Distributing Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Alam, et al v. Construction Protect
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-56380
Plaintiff:
MARGARET A. HOFFMAN, an individual, for herself and on behalf of all others similarly situated and DANIEL LOPEZ
Appellant:
MIAN ALAM, GREAN RASHOD ANDERSON, PETER BAKER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSTRUCTION PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation
William Bullock, et al v. Automobile Club SC, et al
as 8:2001cv00731
Plaintiff:
William Bullock, Arthur A Andelson, Ani Apardian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.