Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Jane Doe v. Televisaunivision Management Co et al
as 2:2024cv03673
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Televisaunivision Management Co, Univision Management Company and Televisaunivision Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ball v. Walmart Inc.
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Non-Profit Organizations 1-5, Doe Corporations 1-5, John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe v. Advanced Micro Targeting, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv06935
Defendant:
DOES 1 to 20, inclusive and Advanced Micro Targeting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Danrich v. Compunet, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01270
Defendant:
Compunet, Inc. and John/Jane Does I-X
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Danrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lo v. China Airlines, Ltd. et al
as 1:2019cv00335
Plaintiff:
Chu Shu Lo
Defendant:
Hung Chang Chou, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Island-Mateo v. Hunt Military Communities Management, LLC
as 1:2019cv00276
Defendant:
Hunt Military Communities Management, LLC, Doe Corporations 1-5, John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Island-Mateo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henao v. Hilton Resorts Corporation, et al
as 1:2018cv00419
Defendant:
Doe Partnerships 1-5, Doe Corporations 1-5, John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Jose G. Henao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Broom v. Mydatt Services, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00358
Defendant:
Doe Partnerships 1-5, Doe Corporations 1-5, John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Broom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jane Doe v. Gate Gourmet, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv01298
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Does and Gate Gourmet, Inc.
Peltier v. Almar Management, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00431
Plaintiff:
Craig U. Peltier
Defendant:
Almar Management, Inc. , John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
