Cases 61 - 70 of 39,875
Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00389
Plaintiff:
Robby Sean Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Laurena Gaxiola v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv03966
Plaintiff:
Laurena Gaxiola
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Nancie Kopesky v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Nancie Kopesky
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mone R. McColum v. Martin O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Mone R McColum
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rogers v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Denise Rogers
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Morel v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Melody B. Morel
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Eisenhower v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05361
Plaintiff:
Emily Eisenhower
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Emily Eisenhower
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS) Wailes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
John Charles Wailes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gaze v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Teddy Gaze
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
