Environmental Matters Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 213
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Kurtis Steele, et al
as 22-35123
Plaintiff / Appellee: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization, SWAN VIEW COALITION and others
Defendant / Appellant: KURTIS E. STEELE, in his capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Flathead National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: MONTANA LOGGING ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Montana Logging Association, et al
as 22-35124
Plaintiff / Appellee: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization, SWAN VIEW COALITION and others
Defendant: KURTIS E. STEELE, in his capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Flathead National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: MONTANA LOGGING ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15029
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization, WILDLANDS NETWORK, a non-profit organization and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEB HAALAND, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, a federal department, MARTHA WILLIAMS, as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2021cv00144
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Bush v. Sonoma West Holdings Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv08853
Plaintiff: William David Bush
Defendant: Sonoma West Holdings Inc and Michael Babbini
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Cooley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2021cv00136
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Native Ecosystems Council
Defendant: Hilary Cooley, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Center For Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 2:2021cv08660
Plaintiff: Center For Biological Diversity
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Hueter et al v. AST Telecomm LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00377
Plaintiff: Steven Jay Pincus Hueter, Faamuli Pete Faamuli and Michael S. Kirk
Defendant: AST Telecomm LLC d/b/a Bluesky Communications, Raj Deo, Paul Michael Young and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2021cv06323
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Debra Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Hueter et al v. Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00344
Plaintiff: Steven Jay Pincus Hueter, Michael S. Kirk, Tao and others
Defendant: Debra Anne Haaland, Gina Raimondo, Martha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?