Cases 1 - 10 of 422
United States of America et al v. Pope Resources et al
as 3:2024cv05470
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Washington, Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe and others
Defendant:
Pope Resources, OPG Properties LLC and OPG Port Gamble LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Institute for Fisheries Resources et al v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05748
Plaintiff:
Institute for Fisheries Resources and Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Giti Tire (USA), Ltd. and others
California Trucking Assoc. v. CA Air Resources Board et al
as 2:2023cv02333
Plaintiff:
California Trucking Association
Defendant:
California Air Resources Board and Steven S. Cliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Patagonia Area Resource Alliance, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-16167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATAGONIA AREA RESOURCE ALLIANCE, ARIZONA MINING REFORM COALITION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and KERWIN S. DEWBERRY, Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA STANDARD LLC and SOUTH32 HERMOSA, INC., AKA Arizona Minerals, Inc.
East Yard Communities For Environmental Justice et al v. South Coast Air Quality Management District et al
as 2:2023cv06682
Plaintiff:
East Yard Communities For Environmental Justice, People's Collective for Environmental Justice, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
South Coast Air Quality Management District, The Governing Board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, California Air Resources Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Nathan Gassman, et al
as 23-35567
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant / Appellant:
NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. American Forest Resource Council, et al
as 23-35568
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant:
NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION
Patagonia Area Resource Alliance et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 4:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Patagonia Area Resource Alliance, Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service and Kerwin S Dewberry
Intervenor Defendant:
South32 Hermosa Incorporated, Arizona Standard LLC and Arizona Minerals Incorporated
Amicus Curiae:
Town of Patagonia
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 1:2023cv00938
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, The Wilderness Society, Friends of the Earth and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Debra Haaland, Karen Mouritsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Cascadia Wildlands, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASCADIA WILDLANDS and KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER
Plaintiff:
OREGON WILD
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, an Oregon non-profit corporation and COUNTY OF DOUGLAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
