Environmental Matters Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 60
The Coalition to Protect Puget Sound Habitat v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 22-35938
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE COALITION TO PROTECT PUGET SOUND HABITAT, a non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, an agency of the United States of America, TODD T. SEMONITE, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Brigadier General, in his official capacity as Commander of the Northwestern Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: TAYLOR SHELLFISH COMPANY, INC.
Don't Cage Our Oceans et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01627
Plaintiff: Don't Cage Our Oceans, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources and others
Defendant: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Scott A Spellmon and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 2:2022cv00371
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity and Idaho Conservation League
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Spellmon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00047
Plaintiff: Friends of the Earth, Montana Environmental Information Center, Sierra Club and others
Defendant: Scott A. Spellmon and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Intervenor Defendant: State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Snake River Waterkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2021cv00101
Defendant: Scott Spellmon and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff: Snake River Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Willamette Riverkeeper et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00034
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Plaintiff: Conservation Angler and Willamette Riverkeeper
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531
WaterWatch of Oregon et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2020cv00413
Plaintiff: WildEarth Guardians, Northwest Environmental Defense Center and WaterWatch of Oregon
Defendant: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)
Intervenor Defendant: Chair Mike Grimm Oregon Water Utility Council and Oregon Farm Bureau Federation
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531
Northern Plains Resource Council et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00044
Plaintiff: Friends of the Earth, Bold Alliance, Northern Plains Resource Council and others
Defendant: LT. General Todd T. Semonite and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Intervenor Defendant: TC Energy Corporation and TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Friends of the River v. NMFS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-15623
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRIENDS OF THE RIVER
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, WILBUR ROSS, Secretary of Commerce, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY
Northwest Environmental Defense Center et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00437
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff: Native Fish Society, Northwest Environmental Defense Center and WildEarth Guardians
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531 Endangered Species Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?