Cases 1 - 10 of 213
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 9:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Humane Society of The United States, Humane Society Legislative Fund and others
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Intervenor:
Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, Safari Club International and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2023cv06601
Plaintiff:
San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant:
United States Fish And Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Gallatin Wildlife Association et al v. Erickson et al
as 9:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Gallatin Wildlife Association, Native Ecosystems Council and Wildearth Guardians
Defendant:
Mary Erickson, Randy Moore, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
The Successor Agency to The Former Emeryville Redevelopment Agency and The City of Emeryville v. Swagelok Company et al
as 3:2017cv00308
Plaintiff:
The Successor Agency to The Former Emeryville Redevelopment Agency and The City of Emeryville
Defendant:
Swagelok Company, William R Cosgrove, David B Cathcart and others
Cross Defendant:
Catherine Lennon Lozick and Hanson
Counter Claimant:
Hanson Building Materials Limited, a British Corporation
Cross Claimant:
Whitney Research Tool Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 CERCLA
City of Torrance v. Hi-Shear Corporation
as 2:2017cv07732
Defendant:
Hi-Shear Corporation and Hi-Shear Corporation a Delaware corporation doing business as LISI Aerospace
Plaintiff:
City of Torrance
3Rd Party Defendant:
Pat Simmons Golf Company, EFCO, Inc a Pennsylvania corporation doing business as Erie Press Systems, Craig Frudenfeld and others
Cross Defendant:
Magellan, Middleton, Inc, Karla Frudenfeld, Wendi Frudenfeld and others
Counter Defendant:
Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc. and Robinson Helicopter Company, Incorporated
Counter Claimant:
Esterline Technologies Corporation, Recreational Vans, Inc, Lyman E Eddy Company and others
Cross Claimant:
DASCO Engineering Corporation
Intervenor:
Federal Insurance Company and Safeco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Save the Yellowstone Grizzly v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al.
as 4:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Save the Yellowstone Grizzly
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Jim Fredericks, Matt Pieron and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Moore et al
as 4:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Maricopa Audubon Society
Defendant:
Randy Moore, Tom Vilsack, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland et al
as 4:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
Deb Haaland and Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. Hilary Cooley, et al
as 23-35436
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant / Appellant:
HILARY COOLEY, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and DEB HAALAND, Secretary, Department of Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. State of Idaho, et al
as 23-35451
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant:
HILARY COOLEY, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and DEB HAALAND, Secretary, Department of Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
