Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16091
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Helena Hunters and Anglers Association et al v. Moore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2022cv00126
Plaintiff: Helena Hunters and Anglers Association, Western Watersheds Project, Sierra Club and others
Defendant: Randy Moore, United States Forest Service, Martha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Haaland et al
as 4:2022cv00303
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife
Defendant: Deb Haaland and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 22-15928
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MARICOPA AUDUBON SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB, Grand Canyon Chapter
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as the Director of FWS and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15809
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MARICOPA AUDUBON SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB, Grand Canyon Chapter
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as the Director of FWS and others
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2022cv00090
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Debra Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
State of Alaska Department of v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-35097
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacityas the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Cen, et al v. BLM, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-35035
Plaintiff / Appellant: KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, OREGON WILD, CASCADIA WILDLANDS and others
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: MURPHY COMPANY
San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv02566
Plaintiff: San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant: United States Fish And Wildlife Service, Deb Haaland and Martha Williams
Petitioner: Westlands Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Unite the Parks et al v. U.S. Forest Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00518
Defendant: United States Forest Service and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff: Earth Island Institute, Sequoia ForestKeeper and Unite the Parks
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?