Cases 121 - 130 of 2,607
Apartment Association of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv05193
Defendant:
Eric Garcetti, City of Los Angeles, City Council of the City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Apartment Association of Los Angeles County, Inc. and Apartment Association of Los Angeles County, Inc. doing business as Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles
Petitioner:
Strategic Actions for a Just Economy and Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action
Amicus Curiae:
Amici Curiae Cities and Counties, Adrienna Wong and National Housing Law Project
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Kristin Mayes, et al
as 23-15234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTIN K. MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JENNIFER CUNICO, o in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor:
BEN TOMA and WARREN PETERSEN
Daniel Crowe, et al v. Oregon State Bar, et al
as 23-35193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL Z. CROWE and OREGON CIVIL LIBERTIES ATTORNEYS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE K. PETERSON I
Defendant / Appellee:
OREGON STATE BAR, a Public Corporation, OREGON STATE BAR BOARD OF GOVERNORS, VANESSA A. NORDYKE, President of the Oregon State Bar Board of Governors and others
De Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Raymond De Botton
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, Warren Lance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Kirk Medak v. State of Alaska, et al
as 23-35118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIRK MEDAK
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ALASKA, MICHELLE HIGUCHI, Judge and LISA MURKOWSKI, Senator, U.S. Congress
Paul Okwuchukwu Iyeke v. Christal Monique Gardiner et al
as 2:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Paul Okwuchukwu Iyeke
Defendant:
Christal Monique Gardiner, Mylene Lopez-Schimmeyer, John Synder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Safari Club International, et al v. Rob Bonta
as 23-15199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, an Arizona nonprofit corporation, UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, an Ohio nonprofit corporation and CONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.
NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta
as 5:2022cv08861
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, LLC doing business as NetChoice
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Eric Goldman, Chamber of Progress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Committee to Recall Dan Holladay, et al v. Jakob Wiley, et al
as 23-35107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMITTEE TO RECALL DAN HOLLADAY, JEANA GONZALES and ADAM MARL
Defendant / Appellee:
JAKOB WILEY, City Recorder for the City of Oregon City, in his official capacity
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Helicopter Association International et al v. State of Hawai'i et al
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Helicopter Association International and Safari Aviation, Inc. doing business as Safari Helicopters Hawaii
Defendant:
State of Hawai'i, Department of Transportation, State of Hawaii, Edwin Sniffen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
