Cases 11 - 17 of 17
McDermott v. Kemper Independence Insurance Company
as 4:2015cv01322
Plaintiff:
Marie McDermott
Defendant:
Kemper Independence Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcus Labertew, et al v. Loral Langemeier
as 14-15879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS LABERTEW, Judgment Creditor, AKA Mark Labertew, JANE DOE LABERTEW, husband and wife, JOHN MCDERMOTT, Judgment Creditor, AKA Jack McDermott and others
Defendant:
LORAL LANGEMEIER
Third Party - Appellee:
CHARTIS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY, Garnishee, FKA AIG Casualty Company and 21ST CENTURY NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Garnishee, FKA American International Insurance Company
McDermott v. Avaya Inc
as 3:2013cv06050
Plaintiff:
Rob McDermott
Defendant:
Avaya Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Labertew et al v. Auzenne et al
as 2:2013cv01785
Plaintiff:
Marcus Labertew , John McDermott and Jennifer McDermott
Defendant:
Loral Langemeier
Garnishee:
Chartis Property Casualty Company , 21st Century North America Insurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
McDermott v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
as 1:2010cv01286
Plaintiff:
John Patrick McDermott, Jr.
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London , Kiln Syndicate No. 510, S.D. Mathers and Others Syndicate No. 807 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
McDermott v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
as 3:2010cv01286
Plaintiff:
John Patrick McDermott, Jr.
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London , Kiln Syndicate No. 510, S.D. Mathers and Others Syndicate No. 807 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
