Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Andrew Shaw v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2018cv01169
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Plaintiff:
Andrew Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Jessie Shaw v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv04353
Plaintiff:
Jessie Shaw
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Shaw v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv00432
Plaintiff:
Jared Shaw
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Culver City Surgical Specialists v. Shaw Industries Group Inc et al
as 2:2017cv02999
Plaintiff:
Culver City Surgical Specialists
Defendant:
Shaw Industries Group Inc and Shaw Industries Group Open Acces Plus Medical Benefits Choice Fund HRA Plan
Maksoud v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2017cv00362
Plaintiff:
Charbel Maksoud
Defendant:
Bruce Hopkins, Schrell Hopkins, Philippe Guelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowser v. Mayer et al
as 5:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
Jay Bowser
Defendant:
Marissa A. Mayer, David Filo, Kenneth A. Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galasyn et al v. Sleight et al
as 2:2017cv00363
Plaintiff:
Edward Galasyn and Marta A. Kingsbury
Defendant:
Vicky Sleight, Douglas Shaw and Galasyn, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Summer v. Mayer et al
as 5:2017cv00787
Plaintiff:
David Summer
Defendant:
Marissa A. Mayer, David Filo, Kenneth A. Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv00575
Plaintiff:
Linda Shaw
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
