Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Arden et al v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford et al
as 3:2013cv05296
Plaintiff:
Roff Arden and Bobbi Arden
Defendant:
Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford , Forsberg Umlauf, P.S. , John Hayes and others
Counter_claimant:
Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford
Counter_defendant:
Bobbi Arden and Roff Arden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Stephen Hayes v. Kia Motors America, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01130
Defendant:
Does 1 - 10, Kia Motors America Inc and Kia Motors Corporation
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hayes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv08532
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hayes v. Synthes USA Sales, LLC
as 2:2012cv01672
Plaintiff:
Houston Hayes
Defendant:
Synthes USA Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes et al v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv01072
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Hayes , Matt Rosston and James W. Beasley, II
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company , United Services Automobile Association , USAA General Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04857
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00698
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C Anaeme
Defendant:
Amerco, U-Haul International Incorporated, U-Haul Self Storage Centers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hayes et al v. Amco Insurance Company et al
as 9:2011cv00137
Plaintiff:
Michael Hayes , Sherri Hayes and Michael's Convenience Stores, Inc.
Defendant:
Amco Insurance Company and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
