Cases 1 - 10 of 649
Henderson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01491
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Henderson
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Siegle v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv01559
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Siegle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brandt v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Daniel S. Brandt
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dolle v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01295
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Dolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Arnesen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05575
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Arnesen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Danielle Douglas v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05759
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Plaintiff:
Danielle Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Danielle et al
as 2:2024cv05758
Plaintiff:
Douglas Danielle
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kyle Daniel King v. Martin OMalley
as 8:2024cv01480
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Plaintiff:
Kyle Daniel King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pinedo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00504
Plaintiff:
Daniel Richard Pinedo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(SS) Pinedo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Daniel Richard Pinedo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
