Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 324
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant: STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court: XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor: THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Our Children's Earth Foundation et al v. Regan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff: Our Children's Earth Foundation and Ecological Rights Foundation
Defendant: Michael S. Regan, Martha Guzman and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
as 23-2946
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Arizona Mining Reform Coalition et al v. Guzman et al
as 2:2023cv02038
Plaintiff: Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, Center for Biological Diversity, Earthworks and others
Defendant: Martha Guzman, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Calumet Montana Refining, LLC v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 23-2183
Petitioner: CALUMET MONTANA REFINING, LLC
Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 4:2023cv04448
Plaintiff: East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice, People's Collective for Environmental Justice, Sierra Club and others
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Martha Guzman, in her official capacity as Regional Administrator for Region 9 of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
as 23-1614
Petitioner: ANTELOPE VALLEY AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor: LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Panoche Energy Center, LLC v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
as 23-1268
Petitioner: PANOCHE ENERGY CENTER, LLC
Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL S. REGAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR OF REGION 9 OF U.S.
Clean Water SoCal et al v. U.S. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01149
Plaintiff: Clean Water SoCal and Central Valley Clean Water Association
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Tomas Torres
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Nevada Cement Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 23-1098
Petitioner: NEVADA CEMENT COMPANY
Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?