Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Friends of the San Juans et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01299
Plaintiff: Friends of the San Juans, Friends of the Earth and Evergreen Islands
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Wilder et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00574
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and Office of Counsel
Plaintiff: Abryel Wilder and Abryel Michole-Meena Wilder
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00275
Defendant: Wynn Coggins, Scott A. Spellmon, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity
Petitioner: Port of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living, et al v. BLM, et al
as 21-35085
Plaintiff / Appellant: SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, SIERRA CLUB, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CHAD PADGETT, in his official capacity as State Director for the Bureau of Land Management Alaska and others
Amicus Curiae: ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and STATE OF ALASKA
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC.
Willamette Riverkeeper v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 6:2020cv02189
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff: Willamette Riverkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
IEN, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-36068
Defendant / Appellee: TODD T. SEMONITE, Commanding General and Chief of Engineers, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, MARGARET EVERSON, in her capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP and TC ENERGY CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK and NORTH COAST RIVERS ALLIANCE
Indigenous Environmental Network et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00115
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, David Bernhardt, United States Department of State and others
Plaintiff: Indigenous Environmental Network and North Coast Rivers Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Alatna Village Council et al v. Padgett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00253
Plaintiff: Tanana Tribal Council, Evansville Tribal Council, Alatna Village Council and others
Defendant: Chad Padgett, Gregory Dudgeon, United States Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 20-16606
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF OHIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL SACKETT, Proposed Defendant-Intervenors and CHANTELL SACKETT
The Coalition to Protect Puget v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 20-35701
Defendant / Appellant: SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Brigadier General, in his official capacity as Commander of the Northwestern Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, JOHN G. BUCK, Colonel, in his official capacity as Commander of the Seattle District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TODD T. SEMONITE, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: TAYLOR SHELLFISH COMPANY, INC and TAYLOR SHELLFISH COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE COALITION TO PROTECT PUGET SOUND HABITAT, a non-profit corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?