Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 226
Mauricio Godoy v. Kathleen Allison
as 21-55942
Petitioner / Appellant: MAURICIO JOSE GODOY, AKA Maurice Godoy, Maurice Videsstrazz Godoy
Respondent / Appellee: KATHLEEN ALLISON, CDCR-CIM Secretary for The State
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01475
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kavin Rhodes v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 21-55870
Petitioner / Appellant: KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Respondent / Appellee: CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, Warden, in individual capacity
Maurice Polk v. Marcus Pollard
as 21-71220
Petitioner: MAURICE ROGERS POLK
Respondent: MARCUS POLLARD, Warden
Maurice Jennings v. W. Montgomery
as 21-71137
Petitioner: MAURICE CHARLES JENNINGS
Respondent: W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden
USA v. Maurice Smith
as 21-50120
Defendant / Appellant: MAURICE LEROME SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Maurice Smith v. USDC-CASD
as 21-71059
Not Classified By Court: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and In re: MAURICE LEROME SMITH
Petitioner: MAURICE LEROME SMITH
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
G2 Staffing Solutions, LLC v. Ivan Maldonado et al
as 5:2021cv00757
Defendant: Does 1 to 25, inclusive, Jesse Madrid, Elite HR, LLC and others
Plaintiff: G2 Staffing Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
David Normand v. Boingo Wireless, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03626
Defendant: Michele V Choka, Terrell Jones, Boingo Wireless, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: David Bower Law Group Normand and David Normand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Azariah Ellington, et al v. Maria Stratton, et al
as 21-55381
Defendant / Appellee: MAURICE LEITER, Judge, ELIZABETH A. GRIMES, Judge, TRICIA BIGELOW, Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MITCHELL D. ELLINGTON and AZARIAH M. ELLINGTON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?