Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 798
Romero v. Garland
as 23-599
Petitioner: DOUGLAS ISRAEL ROMERO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Corpeno Romero, et al. v. Garland
as 23-576
Petitioner: CANDELARIA DE LOS ANGELES CORPENO ROMERO and JAVI ALEXANDER CORNEJO CORPENO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Angelica Romero v. Purpose Funding Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00592
Plaintiff: Angelica Romero
Defendant: Purpose Funding Inc. and DOES 1-10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Deyoe Harris v. Viola Romero, et al
as 23-15184
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEYOE R. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee: VIOLA ROMERO, City of Tucson Attorney, in the official and personal capacity and BERNARD GREENE, City of Tucson Attorney, in the official and personal capacity
Romero Hernandez v. Garland
as 23-138
Petitioner: ESTEBAN ROMERO HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez Romero v. Garland
as 22-2084
Petitioner: FRANCISCO VASQUEZ ROMERO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Paguada Romero v. Garland
as 22-2046
Petitioner: MARVIN NAHUN PAGUADA ROMERO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Harris v. Romero et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00548
Plaintiff: Deyoe R Harris
Defendant: Viola Romero and Bernard Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Escalante-Romero v. Garland
as 22-1912
Petitioner: JACQUELINE ESCALANTE-ROMERO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Michael Perry v. USDC-CALA
as 22-70257
Not Classified By Court: In re: MICHAEL MOSHE PERRY, NP PARC CHATEAUX, LLC, GRAYSTAR ALLIANCE RESIDENTAL, Managing Company/ies and others
Petitioner: MICHAEL MOSHE PERRY
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?