Cases 41 - 50 of 92
State of Washington, et al v. DOS, et al
as 20-35391
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls, CORDELL HULL, BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
FREDRIC'S ARMS & SMITHS, LLC and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.
State of California et al v. Trump et al
as 4:2019cv00872
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Steven T. Mnuchin, United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Southern Border Communities Coalition and Sierra Club
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. State Department and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant:
DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-17502
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy and others
Amicus Curiae:
ANDY BARR, U.S. Representative
Benjamin Barber v. State of Oregon, et al
as 20-35051
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN BARBER
Defendant:
SIMON, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon and ACOSTA, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-56377
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
State of Washington, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 19-35914
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, in his official capacity as Acting Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, a federal agency, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, a federal agency and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRANT AND HEALTHCARE SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS and IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv05210
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, II and others
Plaintiff:
State of Colorado, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs, Little Lobbyists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection et al v. Consumer Advocacy Center Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01998
Defendant:
Tuong Nguyen, Albert Kim, Kaine Wen and others
Receiver:
Thomas W McNamara
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, The People of the State of California and others
Petitioner:
Edu Doc Support, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
