Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. American Forest Resource Council, et al
as 23-35568
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant: NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Nathan Gassman, et al
as 23-35567
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant / Appellant: NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION
Alleghany County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07039
Plaintiff: Alleghany County, North Carolina, Anson County, North Carolina, Buncombe County, North Carolina and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, OK et al v. McKinsey & Company Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv06354
Plaintiff: Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, OK, Board of County Commissioners of Ottawa County, OK, Board of County Commissioners of Delaware County, OK and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Auburn et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04892
Plaintiff: City of Auburn, City of Waterville, Me, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, M City of Bangor, Me and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bozarth v. Meadow Valley Justice Court et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01229
Plaintiff: Eddie Ray Georgewashi Bozarth
Defendant: Meadow Valley Justice Court, Mike Cowley, Lincoln County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
S. C. v. Lincoln County School District We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-35242
Defendant / Appellee: LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff / Appellant: S. C., by her mother and next friend, K.G.
Amicus Curiae: COUNCIL OF PARENT ATTORNEYS AND ADVOCATES, INC.
USA v. Jessie Cox, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-15066
Defendant: HUI CHU POOLE, ANIMAL PLACE, DEBBIE DEVITO and others
Defendant / Appellant: SARAH JANE SHEAHAN, MICHAEL W. SHEAHAN, JOSEPH R. & MICHELLE SHEAHAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lincoln County v. Sackler et al
as 2:2019cv00338
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1 through 100, Beverly Sackler, Rhodes Technologies Inc and others
Plaintiff: Lincoln County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Does v. Lawrence Wasden, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35391
Defendant / Appellee: JOE RODRIGUEZ, Nez Perce County Sheriff, MATTHEW THOMAS, Sheriff, Sexual Offender Management Board, CRAIG T. ROWLAND, Bingham County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOES, John and Jane, 1-134

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?