Cases 1 - 10 of 57
United States of America v. Davis
as 24-1854
Defendant:
MARQUIS DOMINIQUE DAVIS, Bang Oneohone, Tiny Bang and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kinect Renewable Solutions, LLC v. United American Transportation et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Kinect Renewable Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
United American Transportation, Marquis Bond, IMB Logistics, Inc. and others
Newson v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 23-3942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAFEAL DESHAWN NEWSON and Marquis Lee Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, GAYLE COCHRAN, Maricopa County Attorney, CINDY J. WINTERS, Maricopa County Attorney and others
Fannie Mae et al v. Amelia Aid Propco LLC
as 2:2023mc00012
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Amelia Aid Propco LLC, Ashley Aid Propco LLC, Bentley Aid Propco LLC and others
Receiver:
Michael F Flanagan
United States of America v. Holiday
as 23-445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN MARQUIS HOLIDAY
Marquis v. Uecker et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Cory Shannon Marquis
Defendant:
John Uecker, Agricultural Marketing Service, Fair Trade Practices Program and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
USA v. Marquis Hawkins
as 22-10324
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUIS LEONARD HAWKINS
Prime Comms. Retail, LLC v. Lafollette Marquis Henderson IV
as 5:2022cv01513
Petitioner:
PRIME COMMS RETAIL, LLC
Respondent:
Lafollette Marquis Henderson, IV
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marshall Khan v. Clark County Enforcement, et al
as 20-17198
Defendant / Appellee:
AARON FORD, Attorney General, LINDA MARQUIS, STEVEN B. WOLFSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL ABBAS KHAN and MARSHALL ABBAS KHAN, Jr., Esquire
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
