Cases 1 - 10 of 15
National Trust for Historic Preservation et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 2:2019cv05008
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of Interior, David Bernhardt and others
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club, Wilderness Society and National Trust for Historic Preservation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Ctr for Biological Diversity, et al v. Ashton Carter, et al
as 15-15695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK, JAPAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAWYERS FEDERATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ASHTON CARTER, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Defense and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION
National Trust for Historic Preservation v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2014cv05179
Defendant:
United States Postal Service , Patrick R. Donahoe , Tom A Samra and others
Plaintiff:
National Trust for Historic Preservation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
National Trust for Historic Preservation et al v. Suazo et al
as 2:2013cv01973
Defendant:
Raymond Suazo , United States Bureau of Land Management and United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff:
National Trust for Historic Preservation , Wilderness Society and Archaeology Southwest
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Wilderness Society, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, et al
as 11-17482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILDERNESS SOCIETY, ARIZONA WILDERNESS COALITION, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, RON WENKER, JAMES KENNA and others
The Wilderness Society, et al v. Gene Terland, et al
as 11-35821
Plaintiff:
MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit organization
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, FRIENDS OF THE MISSOURI BREAKS MONUMENT, NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE R. TERLAND, on his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management's Montana State Office, ROBERT ABBEY, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States Department of Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
MISSOURI RIVER STEWARDS, FERGUS COUNTY, PHILLIPS COUNTY and others
Montana Wilderness Association, et al v. Gene Terland, et al
as 11-35818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit organization
Plaintiff:
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, FRIENDS OF THE MISSOURI BREAKS MONUMENT, NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE R. TERLAND, on his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management's Montana State Office, ROBERT ABBEY, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States Department of Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
MISSOURI RIVER STEWARDS, FERGUS COUNTY, PHILLIPS COUNTY and others
Guam Preservation Trust et al v. Gregory et al
as 1:2010cv00677
Plaintiff:
Guam Preservation Trust , National Trust for Historic Preservation , We are Guahan and others
Defendant:
Katherine Gregory, Kyle Fujimoto, David Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
The Wilderness Society et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2009cv00096
Plaintiff:
The Wilderness Society, The Wilderness Society, Friends of the Missouri Breaks Monument and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Gene R. Terland, Mike Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
The Wilderness Society et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 9:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
The Wilderness Society, Friends of the Missouri Breaks Monument, National Trust for Historic Preservation and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Gene R. Terland, Mike Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
