Cases 1 - 10 of 247
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 21-15200
Defendant:
LG CHEM, LTD., SONY ENERGY DEVICES CORPORATION, MAXWELL CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS, STEVEN FRANKLYN HELFAND and MICHAEL FRANK BEDNARZ
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 21-15022
Defendant / Appellee:
LG CHEM, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant:
STEVEN FRANKLYN HELFAND
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 19-16855
Defendant / Appellee:
LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
GORDON B. MORGAN
Christopher Andrews, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 19-16803
Defendant / Appellee:
NEC TOKIN CORPORATION, LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS
Williby v. Alphabet Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv05986
Defendant:
Fintage House, Viacom, Alphabet Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Harry J. Williby
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant:
Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor:
Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein and Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court:
Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Counter Defendant:
Rockwell Automation Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Acer America Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Counter Claimant:
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
State of South Carolina and State of California
Claimant:
Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee:
Charles W Daff
Petitioner:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Bradley Seldin, et al v. LG Chem, Ltd., et al
as 18-80042
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
BRADLEY SELDIN, PIYA ROBERT ROJANASATHIT, STEVEN BUGGE and others
Defendant - Respondent:
LG CHEM, LTD., LG CHEM AMERICA, INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION and others
Indirect Purchaser Class, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 17-17436
:
In re: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS
Objector - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee:
PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, NEC CORPORATION and others
Indirect Purchaser Class, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 17-17439
:
In re: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS
Objector - Appellant:
CONNER ERWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, NEC CORPORATION and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Christopher Andrew
as 17-17369
:
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee:
PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SANYO ELECTRIC CO, LTD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
