Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Marshall v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Gus Who Marshall
Defendant:
State of California, U.S. Government, Valley Water and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae:
FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
Daniel Gonzalez v. USA, et al
as 19-16935
Defendant:
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEGAN PUGH, AKA Megan Bernard, VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, a U.S. Government Agency and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL GONZALEZ
State of Washington v. Trump et al
as 2:2019cv01502
Defendant:
Matthew Donovan, US Department of the Interior, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
State of Washington
Amicus Curiae:
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, National Immigration Law Center, Amici Curiae Former U.S. Government Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-16336
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Amicus Curiae:
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FEDERAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE, DUANE MORELY COX, TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION and others
Sierra Club, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-16300
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN BORDER COMMUNITIES COALITION
Amicus Curiae:
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, SABINE DURDEN, DON ROSENBERG, BRIAN McCANN, JUDY ZEITO, MAUREEN MULRONEY, MAUREEN LAQUERRE, DENNIS BIXBY, Angel Families, ANDY BARR, U.S. Representative and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-16299
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy and others
Amicus Curiae:
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, SABINE DURDEN, DON ROSENBERG, BRIAN McCANN, JUDY ZEITO, MAUREEN MULRONEY, MAUREEN LAQUERRE, DENNIS BIXBY, Angel Families, DUANE MORELY COX and others
Sierra Club, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-16102
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity, PATRICK SHANAHAN, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN BORDER COMMUNITIES COALITION
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF VERMONT, SLSCO LTD. and others
Teresa Roy v. State of California, et al
as 18-55708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA RENEE ROY, AKA Teresa Renee Roy Ford-Roy
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, as an individual, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, with all known Public Agencies Facilites, ANY INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT OR THIRD-PARTY INDIVIDUALS IN NAMED IN ANY DOCUMENTATION, Inclusive, et al Ten through Twenty-two and others
Mitchell Feinberg v. U.S. Government
as 2:2017cv09150
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Feinberg
Defendant:
U.S. Government
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
