Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Woods et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods and Melinda Hotchkins
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Estate of Romualdo Barrientos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods and Melinda Hotchkins
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods
Defendant:
Melinda Hotchkins and Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00805
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hayden v. Farrell et al
as 3:2023cv05168
Plaintiff:
Kellon J. Hayden and Kellon Hayden
Defendant:
Michael Farrell, MD Jane Doe, Hertz Vehicles Llc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Harris et al v. Vanderbilt et al
as 2:2023cv00185
Defendant:
Valentino Satoshi Vanderbilt, Jeddidiah Schulz, Nuria Vanderbilt and others
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Lee Harris and James Leo Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Hardison v. Castro et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hardison
Defendant:
Paula Andrea Bedoya Castro and Lyft, Inc. doing business as Lyft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Howe v. Degree et al
as 4:2022cv06159
Plaintiff:
Richard Howe
Defendant:
Darius Benjamin Degree and Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pineda v. Sabree et al
as 2:2022cv01426
Plaintiff:
Frankie R. Pineda, Michael A. Abenante, Amanda Abenante and others
Defendant:
Neal Hakeen Sabree, Lyft, Inc. and Nicolas Raygoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Halstead v. Wilson et al
as 2:2021cv02152
Plaintiff:
Megan Halstead
Defendant:
Peme Revelo Wilson and Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
