Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Kurtis M. Bailey v. Bernzomatic et al
as 2:2016cv01665
Plaintiff:
Kurtis M. Bailey
Defendant:
Bernzomatic, Does, Irwin Industrial Tool Company and others
Jason Logan Abell v. Worthington Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08427
Plaintiff:
Jason Logan Abell
Defendant:
Bernzomatic Inc., Does, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and others
Shari Beneda et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04267
Plaintiff:
John Beneda, Shari Beneda, Doris Cater and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Newell v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2014cv01798
Plaintiff:
Nancie Newell
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberson et al v. Newell Rubbermaid Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv00573
Plaintiff:
Brittany Renae Roberson and Laurence Turner
Defendant:
Newell Rubbermaid Incorporated , Graco Children's Products Incorporated , Felipe De Jesus Sauceda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kabina Dunbar et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01529
Plaintiff:
James E. Ablett, Michael K Ayers, Mark Bowley and others
Defendant:
Does, Medtronic Inc, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc and others
Amber Clavesilla et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv06284
Plaintiff:
Robin Anderson, Christy L Appleby, Christina Armentrout and others
Defendant:
Does, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon LLC and others
Shadbolt v. Bernzomatic et al
as 2:2013cv01298
Plaintiff:
Murray Shadbolt
Defendant:
Bernzomatic and Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Oak River Insurance Company v. Newell Rubbermaid Inc et al
as 8:2013cv00348
Defendant:
Does, Fasteners Inc, Irwin Tools and others
Plaintiff:
Oak River Insurance Company
Newell et al v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 2:2013cv05021
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Newell and Cindy Lou Newell
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
