Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Chen v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00970
Plaintiff:
Dei Mei Chen
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Fagan v. Reebok International, Ltd.
as 3:2012cv02142
Plaintiff:
Stuart Fagan
Defendant:
Reebok International, Ltd. and J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rael v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01479
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elida Rael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Beltran v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
Carmen Beltran
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Maria Bermudez v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv06998
Plaintiff:
Maria Bermudez
Defendant:
Gerald E. Declouette, Does, J.C. Penney Company, Inc. and others
v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 2:2009at01581
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Noss v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 2:2009cv02764
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hortencia Noss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Landino v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00298
Plaintiff:
Maria Landino
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
White et al v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01504
Plaintiff:
Tiny L. White and Burnett L. White
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. and Bayley Construction
Cross Claimant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. and J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Bayley Construction
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kristiansen v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00675
Plaintiff:
Jenan Kristiansen
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.