Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Devlin v. Aon Risk Insurance Services West, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devlin
Defendant:
Aon Risk Insurance Services West, Inc. and Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Abbey v. United States of America, Department of the Navy
as 3:2020cv06443
Plaintiff:
Kevin Abbey, Kim Lewis, Charlie Lyons and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Abbey et al v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv07510
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allegro, Wade Bailey, Richard Alves and others
Defendant:
Tetra Tech, Inc., Tetra Tech EC, Inc. and Tetra Tech EM, Inc.
Interested Party:
Linda Parker Pennington
Not Classified By Court:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Devlin et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00678
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Niall Devlin and Amy Devlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson-Devlin et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 2:2014cv02811
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Nelson-Devlin , Dennis Devlin , Alfonso Racacho, Jr and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson-Devlin et al
as 2:2014at01520
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Nelson-Devlin, Dennis Devlin, Alfonso Racacho, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diane Devlin v. TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 8:2010cv00616
Defendant:
CTS Corporation, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING OF NORTH AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
DIANE DEVLIN
Devlin et al v. Holland America Line Inc et al
as 2:2008cv01594
Plaintiff:
Marion Devlin and Robert Devlin
Defendant:
Holland America Line Inc, Holland America Line NV, Holland America Line and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
