Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Park et al v. Tanota Development, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kyoung Jin Han, Seong Je Park and Seo Jin Park
Defendant:
Sompo Japan Nippon Insurance, Inc., Dusit Thani Guam Resort, Tanota Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Toth et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc et al
as 3:2021cv01038
Defendant:
Pax Labs Inc, Altria Group Inc., Logic Technology Development, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Doreen Toth and Albert Toth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yegorov v. Japan
as 2:2018cv01731
Plaintiff:
Dmitriy Yegorov
Defendant:
Japan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2016cv00458
Defendant:
Autoliv Electronics Asia Pacific, Autoliv Japan Ltd, Ken Garff Automotive Group and others
Plaintiff:
Morgan Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Zaydee Linares et al v. Toyota Motor North America Inc et al
as 8:2015cv01726
Plaintiff:
Zaydee Linares and Emma Romeu
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation Japan and Toyota Motor North America Inc
Kim v. You et al
as 3:2015cv03256
Defendant:
Hee Nam You, Japan, Hirohito and others
Plaintiff:
Kyung Soon Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
You et al v. Japan et al
as 3:2015cv03257
Plaintiff:
Hee Nam You and Kyung Soon Kim
Defendant:
Japan, Hirohito, Akihito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fukuda v. Consulate General of Japan, et al
as 1:2015cv00143
Plaintiff:
Mark Fukuda
Defendant:
Consulate General of Japan, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriella Lukas v. USA Embassy Offices et al
as 2:2015cv02445
Defendant:
Africa Embassy, Armenian Embassy, Canada Embassy and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriella Lukas
Corning Japan K.K. v. Expeditors International Ocean Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01629
Plaintiff:
Corning Japan KK
Defendant:
Expeditors International Ocean Inc and Yang Ming Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
