Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Deborah Smillie v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02325
Plaintiff: Deborah Smillie
Defendant: United States of America; United States Postal Service, United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
John Fulton Dingley v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv06988
Plaintiff: John Dingley
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rafik Shanazari v. United States Postal Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv06070
Plaintiff: Rafik Shanazari
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive, United States Postal Service and Maria Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Leo Pappas v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv05263
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY
Petitioner: MR LEO PAPPAS
Plaintiff: Leo Pappas
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nadine Eisenkolb et al v. United States Postal Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00519
Plaintiff: Cornelia Zeidler and Nadine Eisenkolb
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Kozmin v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2017cv01974
Defendant: John Doe and United States of America, United States Postal Service
Plaintiff: Yevgeniy Kozmin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Personal Injury
Cherry Dietzmann, et al v. Kevin Guinn, et al
as 10-36149
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHERRY DIETZMANN, individually, J.A., II, minor, by and through his mother and guardian Cherry Dietzmann, AKA Jason Anderson and D.A., minor, by and through her mother and guardian, Cherry Dietzmann, AKA Darla Anderson
Defendant: WILLIAM HUTT, Sergeant, DAVID SHEALY, Officer, STACY LUCK, Officer and others
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S OFFICE UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S OFFICE and CITY OF HOMER
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN GUINN and JOHN OLSON, Jr., in their individual capacities
Third-party-defendant: JASON ANDERSON, Sr.
Cherry Dietzmann, et al v. City of Homer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-36098
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHERRY DIETZMANN, individually, J.A., II, minor, by and through his mother and guardian Cherry Dietzmann, AKA Jason Anderson and D.A., minor, by and through her mother and guardian, Cherry Dietzmann, AKA Darla Anderson
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM HUTT, Sergeant, DAVID SHEALY, Officer and STACY LUCK, Officer
Defendant: THE HOMER POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK ROBL, Homer Police Chief and LAWRENCE KUHNS, Sergeant
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S OFFICE UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S OFFICE, KEVIN GUINN and others
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant: CITY OF HOMER
Third-party-defendant: JASON ANDERSON, Sr.
Lockrem v. United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture
as 2:2010cv00870
Plaintiff: James Lockrem, Jr.
Defendant: United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lockrem v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00871
Plaintiff: James Lockrem, Jr.
Defendant: Jeremy Smith and United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?