Cases 21 - 30 of 232
Howard Hofelich, et al v. State of Hawaii, et al
as 22-16525
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD ROBERT HOFELICH
Intervenor Plaintiff:
SOUTH PACIFIC SCUBA TOURS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII, DCCA, DLNR, DENNIS KRUEGER, Esq. and others
Davidow et al v. Zalnatrav Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01594
Counter Defendant:
David Davidow and Sheryl De Mers
Defendant:
Zalnatrav, Inc., Ravenark, Travis B. Brandt and others
Counter Claimant:
Zalnatrav Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
T.J. Kraft Ltd. v. Chou et al
as 1:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
T.J. Kraft Ltd.
Defendant:
Samuel Chou, George Chiu, William Tan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jane Doe v. United States
as 2:2022cv08156
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jane Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice, et al
as 22-35853
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, STATE OF LOUISIANA, CITY OF BATON ROUGE, and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Sahm v. Ali et al
as 2:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Teri Kealoha Sahm
Defendant:
Karim Ali, Jagroop Singh, Seth Goodstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Jane Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice, et al
as 22-35752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT STATE OF LOUISIANA, CITY OF BATON ORGANIZATIONS ACT AND ROUGE AND PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE and others
Doe v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2022cv04963
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jeffrey Sherburne et al v. Walter Bowman et al
as 5:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sherburne, Thomas Brackin, Keith Manley and others
Defendant:
Walter Bowman, Bruce Dalfonso, James Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Private Client Fiduciary Corporation et al v. Chopra et al
as 2:2022cv00436
Petitioner:
Joginder Chopra and Private Client Fiduciary Corporation
Respondent:
Pham Singh Chopra, Akal Institute and Jane Doe Chopra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
