Cases 111 - 120 of 9,897
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bailey v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
John Bailey
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Barry Roska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Goldstein et al v. Henry et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Alex Goldstein, Scott Whittington and Armour LLC doing business as Redneck Wine Company
Defendant:
Ben Henry and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Monroe, County of
as 2:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Monroe, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carrillo v. Cricket Wireless et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Cricket Wireless, Homesite Insurance, Christopher Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
