Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Ian Elliott Davies et al v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2014cv00907
Plaintiff:
Reverend J. Edwin Bacon, Jr, Rabbi Amy Bernstein, Reverend Father Ian Elliott Davies and others
Defendant:
William T. Fujioka and Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rebrik v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv05411
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Rebrik
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, David N. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Ishkov v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv05412
Plaintiff:
Ivan Ishkov
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, David N. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Luu v. Clement et al
as 5:2007cv04493
Plaintiff:
Bao Chris Tu Luu
Defendant:
Paul Clement, Michael Chertoff, David N. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Mahmood v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2007cv04233
Plaintiff:
Arif Mahmood
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, David N. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Raeissi v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2007cv02458
Plaintiff:
Farnak Raeissi
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, David N. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zarkesh v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2007cv02459
Plaintiff:
Amir Masoud Zarkesh
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales, David N. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
