Cases 11 - 20 of 393
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 4712 Enhancement of contractor protection from reprisal for disclosure of certain information
Haywood v. Kitsap County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv05063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Aaron Haywood
Defendant:
Kitsap County Sheriff, Kitsap County Judiciary, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dozier v. Armstrong
as 3:2024cv05046
Plaintiff:
Odiscious Dozier
Defendant:
David Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Christel et al
as 3:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
David W Christel, Tiffany M Cartwright and Grady J Leupold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Webb v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv06034
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington, Kitsap County, Chad M Enright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hagos v. Goodwill et al
as 2:2023cv01700
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Goodwill, SCORE Jail, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
