Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 145
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16022
Plaintiff: KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant: ANDREW D. PARKER, PARKER DANIELS KIBORT, LLC, KURT B. OLSEN and others
Defendant / Appellee: BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant: ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16023
Plaintiff: KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant: ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant / Appellee: BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant: ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 22-16490
Plaintiff / Appellee: ARIZONA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, VOTO LATINO and PRIORITIES USA
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Defendant: KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Arizona, LARRY NOBLE, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Apache County Recorder, DAVID STEVENS, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Cochise County Recorder, previously named as David Stephens and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: YUMA COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE
Kari Lake, et al v. Katie Hobbs, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-16413
Plaintiff / Appellant: KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Defendant / Appellee: KATIE HOBBS, Arizona Secretary of State, BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Carrillo v. Pima County Community College District et al
as 4:2022cv00359
Plaintiff: Carlos Carrillo
Defendant: Pima County Community College District, Michelle Nieuwenhuis, Alex Carranza and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Elizabeth Williams v. Arizona Superior Court of Pima County, et al
as 22-16131
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELIZABETH ROSE WILLIAMS, on behalf of V.E.W. and M.R.D.
Defendant / Appellee: ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY, an Agent for the State of Arizona, ARIZONA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT, an Agent for the State of Arizona, PAUL E. TANG, an Arizona resident, Retired Judge listed agent for Arizona Superior Court of Pima County and the United States District of Arizona and others
Terrence Bressi v. Pima County Board of Superviso, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15123
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERRENCE BRESSI
Defendant / Appellee: PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, MARK NAPIER, Pima County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, CHRISTOPHER NANOS, Former Pima County Sheriff, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00019
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Leighton v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2021cv00535
Plaintiff: Warren Craig Leighton
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Phoenix, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?