Cases 21 - 30 of 2,685
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Moorhead II v. Manteca et al
as 1:2024at00088
Plaintiff:
Bradley Moorhead II
Defendant:
City Of Manteca, Officer Raul Hernandez and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinski v. City of Philomath et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pinski
Defendant:
City of Philomath, Blake Bowers, City of Corvallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alfred McZeal v. City of Tustin et al
as 8:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Alfred McZeal, Jr
Defendant:
City of Tustin, Brad Steen, Nicholas A. Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrow v. Genius Fund et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Andrea Morrow
Defendant:
Genius Fund, Liam Palmieri, Chris Finelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Todd Michael Schultz v. Superior Court of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv10715
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Schultz
Defendant:
Superior Court of Los Angeles, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lake v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2023cv01870
Plaintiff:
Mason Lake
Defendant:
City of Portland, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
