Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 217
Ronald Strasser, Jr. v. State of Oregon, et al
as 22-35498
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD KENNETH STRASSER, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF OREGON, by and through Governor Kate Brown, in her individual capacity, KATE BROWN, in her individual capacity, SHELLEY HOFFMAN, State Risk Manager and others
Casandra Pastora, et al v. County of San Bernardino, et al
as 22-55617
Plaintiff / Appellant: CASANDRA PASTORA, Deceased by and through her Successor in interest, Saeed Toghraie and SAEED TOGHRAIE, individually
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a public entity, SHERIFF-CORONER JOHN MCMAHON, individually, and in his offical capacity, SHERIFF-CORONER SHANNON D. DICUS, in his individual/official capacity and others
Weldon, et al. v. Francis, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00208
Plaintiff: Heather Weldon and Ryan Weldon
Defendant: CARTER FRANCIS, SAMUEL CHRISTENSEN, John Kempf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christine Beirne, et al v. California Forensic Medical Group, et al
as 22-55464
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTINE BEIRNE and KEVIN BEIRNE, parents of Alexander Beirne individually, and as representatives of the estate of Alexander Beirne
Defendant / Appellee: CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, MAHSA CHADORCHI, JAYLN ROBERTS and others
Defendant: COUNTY OF VENTURA, WILLIAM AYUB, Sheriff, KUREDJIAN, Captain and others
Ronald Strasser, Jr. v. State of Oregon, et al
as 22-35265
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD KENNETH STRASSER, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF OREGON, by and through Governor Kate Brown, in her individual capacity, KATE BROWN, in her individual capacity, SHELLEY HOFFMAN, State Risk Manager and others
K.J.P., et al v. County of San Diego, et al
as 22-55392
Plaintiff / Appellee: K.J.P., a minor, individually, by and through their mother, Loan Thi Minh Nguyen, K.P.P., a minor, individually, by and through their mother, Loan Thi Minh Nguyen and LOAN THI MINH NGUYEN, who also sues individually and as successor in interest to her now deceased husband, Lucky Phounsy
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY NANG CHANTHAPHANH, individually
Defendant / Appellant: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and RICHARD FISCHER, Sheriff's Department deputy (#3003)
Defendant: SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DEAN ALLEN, Sheriff's Department deputy (#4591), AARON BROOKE, Sheriff's Department corporal (#2820) and others
Torres v. Paredes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00448
Plaintiff: Eucebio Torres
Defendant: Officer G. Paredes, Officer A. Navarro, Officer J. Cazares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
K.J.P., et al v. County of San Diego, et al
as 22-55216
Plaintiff / Appellee: K.J.P., a minor, individually, by and through their mother, Loan Thi Minh Nguyen, K.P.P., a minor, individually, by and through their mother, Loan Thi Minh Nguyen and LOAN THI MINH NGUYEN, who also sues individually and as successor in interest to her now deceased husband, Lucky Phounsy
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY NANG CHANTHAPHANH, individually
Defendant / Appellant: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and RICHARD FISCHER, Sheriff's Department deputy (#3003)
Defendant: SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DEAN ALLEN, Sheriff's Department deputy (#4591), AARON BROOKE, Sheriff's Department corporal (#2820) and others
Maea v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2022at00211
Plaintiff: Ernest Maea
Defendant: Christian Pfeiffer, Michael Felder, Lt. A Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kimberly Marroquin v. Unidentified LAPD Officer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv07607
Plaintiff: Kimberly Marroquin
Defendant: Unidentified LAPD Officer, Captain Richard Paul Stabile, City of Los Angeles and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Richard Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?