Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-17239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellee:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellee:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
California Medical Transportat, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION, INC., a California corporation, LONNY SLOCUM, an individual and GMD TRANSPORTATION, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
California Medical Transportat, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55334
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION, INC., a California corporation, GMD TRANSPORTATION, INC., a California corporation and LONNY SLOCUM, an individual
Defendant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the State Department of Health Services, State of California
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
California Medical Transportat, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55103
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION, INC., a California corporation, GMD TRANSPORTATION, INC., a California corporation and LONNY SLOCUM, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the State Department of Health Services, State of California
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Timothy Whiting v. Stan Henry, et al
as 11-56246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY LEWIS WHITING
Defendant - Appellee:
STAN HENRY, former Chief of Police, in his individual capacity as a peace officer with the Cathedral City Police Department, STANLEY SNIFF, individually as Sheriff of Riverside County, DAVID G. DOMINGUEZ, former Chief of Police, in his individual capacity as a peace officer with the Palm Springs Police Department and others
Graves v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2011cv01120
Plaintiff:
Peter Graves
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G., et al v. State of Hawaii, Department of, et al
as 11-15578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
G., parent and next friend of K., a disabled minor child, D., parent and next friend of E., a disabled minor child, M., parent and next friend of I., a disabled minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, LILLIAN B. KOLLER, Director, State of Hawaii, Department of Human Services, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
