Cases 41 - 50 of 113
Charles Kinney v. Mariano-Florentino Cuellar, et al
as 18-16402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIANO-FLORENTINO CUELLAR, TANI G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CAROL A. CORRIGAN and others
Marilu Touma v. General Counsel of the Regents, et al
as 18-55996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARILU F. TOUMA
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE REGENTS, AKA The Regents, VEENA RANGANATH, ROY ALTMAN and others
Wade Robertson v. Richard Honn, et al
as 18-16304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD A. HONN, CATHERINE D. PURCELL, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN and others
Wade Robertson v. Richard Honn, et al
as 18-15933
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD A. HONN, CATHERINE D. PURCELL, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN and others
Kinney v. Cuellar et al
as 3:2018cv01041
Plaintiff:
Charles G Kinney
Defendant:
Mariano-Florentino Cuellar, Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, Carol A. Corrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Goodwin v. Aspen Quality Care Inc
as 2:2017cv00375
Plaintiff:
Savanna Goodwin
Defendant:
Aspen Quality Care Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles Kinney v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 17-16988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
TANI G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE, MARIANO FLORENTINO CUELLAR, CAROL A. CORRIGAN and others
Goodwin v. Amazon Services, LLC, et al.
as 1:2017cv01157
Plaintiff:
Loraine Goodwin
Defendant:
Amazon Services, LLC and Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Prater v. Irvin Goodwin, et al
as 17-16542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER KYLE PRATER
Defendant - Appellee:
IRVIN GOODWIN and HOMELESS VETERANS EMERGENCY HOUSING FACILITY
Gary Goodwin v. Dave Iverson, et al
as 17-35376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY LEE GOODWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE IVERSON, Deputy, KEVIN FRAHM, Officer, JESSE BLASER, Deputy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
