Cases 41 - 50 of 145
Cutler v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2018cv00383
Defendant:
Grant Reed, Unknown Barnes, Unknown Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Steven Cutler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lopshire v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 4:2018cv00333
Defendant:
Pima County Board of Administrator, Lisa Green, James Marner and others
Plaintiff:
Caraleen Marie Lopshire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
Wade Travis Webb
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Clarence Dupnik, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bressi v. Pima County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Terrence Bressi
Defendant:
Pima County Board of Supervisors, Mark Napier, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arek Fressadi v. Kathryn Glover, et al
as 18-15310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AREK FRESSADI
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHRYN ANN GLOVER, ROD ROBERTSON ENTERPRISES, INC., COUNTY OF PIMA and others
Arek Fressadi v. Kathryn Glover, et al
as 17-17092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AREK FRESSADI
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHRYN ANN GLOVER, ROD ROBERTSON ENTERPRISES, INC., COUNTY OF PIMA and others
Daschke et al v. Hartenstein et al
as 4:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
Karl Daschke , Gretchen Daschke and Joshua Daschke
Defendant:
Theodore Hartenstein, JP Siress, Mark Napier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rheinlander v. Lindenau et al
as 4:2017cv00409
Plaintiff:
Carly Rheinlander
Defendant:
Eric Lindenau, Chris Nanos and Pima, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patricia Bauerle v. Patricia Bauerle, et al
as 17-15544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA BAUERLE
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA BAUERLE, GREGORY A. SMITH, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
