Cases 71 - 80 of 119
Crawford v. Olsen et al
as 2:2014cv00667
Plaintiff:
Arthur Crawford, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Olsen and Amanda Perseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nancy Nolette v. Roger Tobler, et al
as 13-17392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NANCY A. NOLETTE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER TOBLER, in their official and individual capacities, CAM WALKER, in their official and individual capacities, DUNCAN MCCOY, in their official and individual capacities and others
Steve Ballard et al v. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department et al
as 8:2013cv00908
Plaintiff:
Steve Ballard and Catherine Olsen
Defendant:
George Bloomfield, Does, Bary L Schlieder and others
Drury v. Milito et al
as 2:2013cv00736
Plaintiff:
Jordan Drury
Defendant:
Michael Milito, Tyler Olsen and City of Susanville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Lynn Gavin v. Bartholomew Murphy, et al
as 13-15622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNN GAVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARTHOLOMEW MURPHY, MICHAEL J. ANTONINI, RICH HILLIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Warrack v. Tehachapi Valley Healthcare District et al
as 1:2013at00165
Plaintiff:
Mary Carleen Warrack
Defendant:
Tehachapi Valley Healthcare District , Alan Burgess, Andrew Petty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Westby v. State of Alaska et al
as 4:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Charles W Westby
Defendant:
State of Alaska and Randy Olsen
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
