Cases 71 - 80 of 172
Doe 1 et al v. Superior Court of California County of Orange
as 8:2018cv01499
Plaintiff:
Doe 1, Doe 6, Doe 4 and others
Defendant:
Superior Court of California County of Orange and Superior Court of California, County of Orange
Intervenor:
Jose Monteagudo and Rudy Padrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
Bugoni v. Jones et al
as 2:2018cv01876
Plaintiff:
Piero A Bugoni
Defendant:
Jontae Jones, Rudy Minares, Ernesto Calderon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Mohiuddin et al v. Apache Junction, City of et al
as 2:2018cv01801
Plaintiff:
Mehmood Mohiuddin and Hitching Post Pizza & Pub LLC
Defendant:
Apache Junction, City of , Bryant Powell , Matt Busby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lei v. City Of Oakland et al
as 3:2018cv03061
Defendant:
City Of Oakland , Oakland Police Department and Rudy Villegas
Plaintiff:
Kei Wei Lei
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera v. City of Fremont et al
as 3:2018cv02843
Plaintiff:
Rudi Herrera
Defendant:
City of Fremont, Richard Lucero, Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Rudy Reyes v. JPay, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00315
Defendant:
Sunrise Banks National Association, Praxell Inc. and JPay, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joe Rudy Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018at00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rivera v. Daniel Bogden, et al
as 2:2017cv02776
Defendant:
Daniel Bogden, Corrections Corporation of America, Amber Craig and others
Plaintiff:
Rudy Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
