Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00774
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04698
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00905
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Danica Roem et al
as 2:2024cv04886
Defendant:
K-Swiss, Inc., Regal Dickson City, Metropolitan City of Rome Capital and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. City of Lake Oswego et al
as 3:2024cv00813
Defendant:
City of Lake Oswego, Chief George Burke and Michael Svoboda
Plaintiff:
Nicole Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Erwine v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Erwine
Defendant:
United States of America, Churchill County, Benjamin Trotter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
v. Erwine et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Defendant:
Michael Erwine, United States of America, Churchill County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
