Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Charles E. Williams et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv06881
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Williams, A & W Development Co., Inc. and A and W Development Co. Inc.
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, City of Los Angeles Police Department Officer Tyson Hamoka, sued in his individual and official capacity, Matthew Lum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00783
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Williams v. People of the State of California et al
as 3:2015cv03013
Petitioner:
Charles Lee Williams
Respondent:
People of the State of California, Dianne Hyatt, Roy Hashimoto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. State of Nevada Department of Parole and Probation et al
as 2:2014cv01785
Defendant:
Sgt. P.O. Brown, P.O. Calloway, P.O. Watford and others
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries et al
as 3:2013cv05206
Plaintiff:
Charles Donald Williams, M.D. CGP
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries , Gary M. Franklin, M.D. and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Gregoire et al
as 2:2011cv01049
Plaintiff:
Charles H Williams
Defendant:
Christine Gregoire , Judy Schurke , Rob McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Williams, Jr. v. Porterville Police Department, et al
as 10-15748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DAVID WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
PORTERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and DOMINIC BARTEAU
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Charles David Williams, Jr. v. Barreau
as 1:2008cv00546
Plaintiff:
Charles David Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Dominick Barreau
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
