Cases 1 - 10 of 2,710
Pelletier et al v. Chatterley et al
as 9:2024cv00129
Defendant:
Mineral County, Kendra Chatterley, John Does 110 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Pelletier and Deborah J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jules Falcone et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv07736
Defendant:
Officer Villegas, Officer John Doe Parking Enforcement 2, Officer Contreras and others
Plaintiff:
Jules Falcone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Gathing et al
as 2:2024cv01626
Defendant:
Jason Gathing and Brian Benitez
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Zayas v. Reykdal et al
as 2:2024cv01335
Defendant:
John Doe, David Hoekendorf, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Myriam Zayas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sugg v. Boyer et al
as 4:2024cv00070
Defendant:
Tom Boyer, Valley County Sheriff's Office, Valley County and others
Plaintiff:
Bobi Sugg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnston v. State of Montana, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv00053
Defendant:
State of Montana, Department of Corrections, Gavin Roselles, George Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Debbie Smith Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
He Zhou v. John Does
as 2:2024cv06965
Defendant:
John Does
Plaintiff:
He Zhou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belinda C. Muhammad v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv06775
Plaintiff:
Belinda C. Muhammad
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
