Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Roman Colter, et al v. Jason Holmberg, et al
as 17-17264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROMAN COLTER and VIRGINIA COLTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON HOLMBERG, Superior Court, JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., U.S. Supreme Court, CHAPMAN CHEVROLET and others
Negron v. Brown et al
as 1:2015at00433
Plaintiff:
Luis Negron
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Matthew Cate, John H. Katavich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Negron v. Brown et al
as 1:2015cv00808
Plaintiff:
Luis Negron
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Matthew Cate, John H. Katavich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dolly Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated, et al
as 13-15607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLLY G. TETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BORST AUTOMOTIVE INCORPORATED, CARLA SOTOMAYOR, JAN E. KEARNEY and others
Dolly Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated, et al
as 12-16840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLLY G. TETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BORST AUTOMOTIVE INCORPORATED, CARLA SOTOMAYOR, SCOTT MACMILLAN BAKER and others
Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated et al
as 4:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
Dolly G Teters
Defendant:
Borst Automotive Incorporated, Carla Sotomayor, Scott MacMillan Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Asjes v. NKSP Medical CMO, et al
as 1:2012cv01062
Plaintiff:
Allen Asjes
Defendant:
NKSP Medical CMO, WSP Medical CMO, Sao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dolly Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated, et al
as 12-15223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLLY G. TETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BORST AUTOMOTIVE INCORPORATED, CARLA SOTOMAYOR, SCOTT MACMILLAN BAKER and others
Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated et al
as 4:2011cv00727
Plaintiff:
Dolly G Teters
Defendant:
Borst Automotive Incorporated, Carla Sotomayor, Scott MacMillan Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
