Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Mathis v. Stephens et al
as 2:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Dontae Mathis
Defendant:
Robert Stephens and Monica Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. Amburgey et al
as 2:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Dontae Mathis
Defendant:
M. Amburgey, Esq. Peter Thunell, Jess Marchese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rodriguez, III et al v. Orange County et al
as 3:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Marcus Rodriguez, III and Valerie Castaneda
Defendant:
Orange County, C. Mathis, D. Pultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Mathis v. Truvillo
as 2:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Dontae Mathis
Defendant:
Monica Truvillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. Thunell et al
as 2:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Dontae Mathis
Defendant:
Peter Thunell, Jess Marchese, State of Oregon DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chang et al
as 2:2022at00807
Plaintiff:
Ger Chong Ze Chang, Mai Nou Vang, Russell Mathis and others
Defendant:
County of Siskiyou and Jeremiah LaRue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chang et al v. County of Siskiyou et al
as 2:2022cv01378
Plaintiff:
Ger Chong Ze Chang, Mai Nou Vang, Russell Mathis and others
Defendant:
County of Siskiyou and Jeremiah LaRue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Mathis-Mathews v. White House et al
as 2:2022cv01071
Plaintiff:
Jerrad Alen Mathis-Mathews
Defendant:
White House and Fed Reg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. Taylor et al
as 3:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
John F. Mathis, Sr.
Defendant:
Treg R. Taylor and Antony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
